Welcome to Labeled Immunoassays and Clinical Medicine website!

Comparison of Analysis Results of Red Blood Cells in Urine with Variety of Detection Methods

Expand
  • Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fengrun District Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Tangshan City, Tangshan 063000, China

Received date: 2014-11-06

  Revised date: 2015-01-12

  Online published: 2015-09-16

Abstract

Abstract:Objective To explore the importance of microscope examination in detection of red blood cell in urine with urine dry chemistry analyzer and automatic sediment analyzer. Methods 800 cases of fresh morning urine were randomly collected and the content of red blood cell in urine was detected by using microscopy, dry chemistry analyzer and automatic urine sediment analyzer respectively. The results were analyzed and compared. Results The positive rate of red blood cell was 31.3% with dry chemistry analyzer method, 27% with urine erythrocyte sediment analyzer and 21% with urine sediment microscopic examination. The false positive rate for dry chemical method and sediment analyzer method in the detection of urinary red blood cell were 10.6% and 9%, and the false negative were 2.7% and 2.5% respectively. Conclusion When the red cells result in samples is abnormal, the microscopic examination must be used for abnormal specimens detection to confirm the diagnosis, and strive to provide a more accurate test results for clinical to avoid misdiagnosis.

Cite this article

WU Lian-jie . Comparison of Analysis Results of Red Blood Cells in Urine with Variety of Detection Methods[J]. Labeled Immunoassays and Clinical Medicine, 2015 , 22(6) : 584 . DOI: 10.11748/bjmy.issn.1006-1703.2015.06.033

Options
Outlines

/