欢迎访问《标记免疫分析与临床》官方网站!
临床研究

血清人附睾分泌蛋白4在卵巢上皮性癌中的临床价值

展开
  • 苏州市立医院东区三病区妇科,江苏 苏州 215001
郑翠,女,硕士,主治医师,毕业于华中科技大学同济医学院

收稿日期: 2015-03-27

  修回日期: 2015-06-28

  网络出版日期: 2015-11-05

基金资助

江苏省苏州市“科教兴卫”青年科技项目(编号:KJXW2012025)

Value of Serum Human Epididymis Secretory Protein 4 Assay in the Diagnosis of Epithelial Ovarian Malignancy

Expand
  • Department of Gynecology, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou 215001, China

Received date: 2015-03-27

  Revised date: 2015-06-28

  Online published: 2015-11-05

摘要

摘要:目的 研究血清人附睾蛋白4(HE4)在卵巢恶性肿瘤中的诊断价值。方法 用酶联疫吸附试验方法对卵巢上皮性癌组(54例)、盆腔良性疾病组(60例)、正常组(60例)妇女血清中HE4和CA125进行双盲检测,结果以中位数表示,分析比较两者单独检测诊断卵巢恶性肿瘤的价值。血清HE4和CA125的正常值分别为0~140pmol/L和0~35KU/L,其中任一指标高于正常即为阳性。结果 ①卵巢上皮性癌组血清HE4和CA125水平分别为142.72pmol/L和136.07KU/L,分别与盆腔良性疾病组(分别为63.72pmol/L和72.20KU/L)和正常组(分别为57.82pmol/L和57.42KU/L)比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。②以盆腔良性疾病组作参照人群时,HE4和CA125单独检测的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC-AUC)分别为0.958和0.886,两者比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。③以ROC曲线最左上方的点130pmol/L、正常组95%参考值80pmol/L和正常值的上限140pmol/L为界值点,比较HE4单项检测对卵巢上皮性恶性肿瘤的诊断能力,结果显示,界值点为80pmol/L的特异度和阳性预测值均为88%,明显低于界值点为130(分别为93%和90%)和140pmol/L(分别为93%和95%)时的特异度和阳性预测值(P<0.01)。结论 HE4单项检测诊断卵巢上皮性恶性肿瘤的特异度优于CA125单项检测。以140pmol/L为界值点,对卵巢上皮性恶性肿瘤的早期诊断准确率更高,而以130pmol/L为界值点有利于卵巢上皮性恶性肿瘤的筛查、降低漏诊率。

本文引用格式

郑 翠,吴锦昌,杨 如 . 血清人附睾分泌蛋白4在卵巢上皮性癌中的临床价值[J]. 标记免疫分析与临床, 2015 , 22(9) : 842 . DOI: 10.11748/bjmy.issn.1006-1703.2015.09.005

Abstract

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the value of human epididymis secretory protein 4 (HE4) in the diagnosis of epithelial ovarian malignancy. Methods The serum HE4 and CA125 levels in 54 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, 60 cases of benign ovarian diseases and 60 healthy women were detected. The serum levels and the diagnosis efficiency of the HE4 and CA125 were analyzed. Results The median levels of HE4 and CA125 were significantly higher in epithelial ovarian cancer group (142.72 pmol/L and 136.07ku/L respectively) than those of the benign ovarian diseases group (63.72pmol/L and 70.20ku/L respectively) and healthy women group (57.82pmol/L and 57.42ku/L respectively)(P<0.01). The operating characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC) of HE4 and CA125 assay were 0.958 and 0.886 respectively, there was statistically difference between them (P<0.001). Conclusion The specificity of HE4 assay has advantage over CA 125 in the diagnosis of epithelial ovarian malignancy.
Options
文章导航

/