欢迎访问《标记免疫分析与临床》官方网站!
方法研究

ELISA方法进行婴幼儿HBsAg弱阳性标本检测的方法学评估

展开
  • (上海市儿童医院 上海交通大学儿童医院检验科, 上海200040 )

收稿日期: 2014-11-06

  网络出版日期: 2015-09-16

基金资助

本研究受上海交通大学医工交叉基金资助,项目编号:YG2013MS75

Detection of HBsAg Weakly Positive Specimens in Infants with ELISA

Expand
  • (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shanghai Children’s Hospital, Shanghai 200040, China)

Received date: 2014-11-06

  Online published: 2015-09-16

摘要

摘要:目的 评价ELISA 方法在检测婴幼儿 HBsAg 时的适用性。 方法 用弱阳性混合血清评价 ELISA 方法测定HBsAg时的精密度;使用经化学发光法定值的混合血清系列稀释,分析 ELISA 方法测定HBsAg时的检出限;使用添加350μmol/L 胆红素或 5g/L 血红蛋白的系列浓度血清评价该方法的抗干扰能力;收集临床 1岁以下患儿化学发光方法检测弱阳性(<5ng/mL)的样品,进行化学发光和 ELISA 方法的比对,并以化学发光确证试验为参考方法评价 ELISA 方法的诊断灵敏度、特异性和诊断效能。 结果 在弱阳性水平上(1ng/mL, S/CO=4.97)ELISA 方法测定 HBsAg 的变异系数为 18.91%;检出限为 0.125ng/mL;350μmol/L 胆红素或 5g/L 血红蛋白对检验结果准确度无显著影响;经比对,ELISA法与化学发光法在小于 0.25ng/mL区间一致率为30.3%,而在大于 0.25ng/mL 区间一致率达 95.6%;以二者一致和化学发光法中和试验为参考方法,ELISA 方法的灵敏度为 87.14%,阴性预测值为 79.07%。 结论 ELISA方法尽管分析灵敏度低于化学发光法,然而它在测定婴幼儿弱阳性标本时,分析性能尚可接受,考虑到其方法的易得和低廉的成本,ELISA方法仍不失为一种好的筛查方法。

本文引用格式

侯 睿, 陈 黎,韩碧芸, 马 展 . ELISA方法进行婴幼儿HBsAg弱阳性标本检测的方法学评估[J]. 标记免疫分析与临床, 2015 , 22(7) : 698 . DOI: 10.11748/bjmy.issn.1006-1703.2015.03.033

Abstract

Abstract:  Objective To explore the applicability of ELISA for HBsAg detection in infants. Methods The HBsAg weakly positive pooled serums were used to evaluate the precision of ELISA. The serial dilutions of pooled serum were detected and valued by CMIA to analysis the LOD of ELISA in measuring HBsAg. The 350umol/L bilirubin or 5g/L hemoglobin were added into serum to perform interference test. The serum samples from infant (<1 year) that were HBsAg positive tested with CMIA were detected with ELISA to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity of ELISA. Results As to 1 ng/mL HBsAg weakly positive level sample, the coefficient of variation of ELISA was 18.91% and the LOD was 0.125 ng/mL. The addition of 350 umol/L bilirubin or 5 g/L hemoglobin had no significant effect on the accuracy of test results. As to less than 0.25 ng/mL HBsAg weakly positive level sample, the consistency of detection results by ELISA and CMIA was 30.3%, whereas on the level above 0.5 ng/mL, the consistency reached 95.6%. The diagnostic sensitivity of ELISA was 87.14%, and the negative predictive value was 79.07%. Conclusion Despite the sensitivity of the ELISA method is worse than that of CMIA, however, on weakly positive level, the analytical performance of ELISA still acceptable. ELISA is a good screening method.
Options
文章导航

/