欢迎访问《标记免疫分析与临床》官方网站!
临床研究

肺癌患者血清MIC-1升高的临床价值

展开
  • 北京协和医学院中国医学科学院肿瘤医院/肿瘤研究所,北京 100021
沈迪。E-mail:sweetsmile976@sohu.com

收稿日期: 2013-10-18

  修回日期: 2014-01-24

  网络出版日期: 2014-07-15

基金资助

1.国家高技术研究发展863计划资助项目(2008AA02Z415);2.北京希望马拉松专项基金临床课题(LC2012A12);3.中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费资助项目(JK2011B05)。

Clinical Value of Serum MIC-1 Level in Patients with Lung Cancer

Expand
  • Cancer Institute & Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100021, China

Received date: 2013-10-18

  Revised date: 2014-01-24

  Online published: 2014-07-15

摘要

目的 研究巨噬细胞抑制因子-1(MIC-1) 血清水平在肺癌诊断中的临床应用价值。方法 采用双抗体夹心ELISA法检测256例肺癌患者、44例肺良性疾病患者及229例正常对照人群血清MIC-1浓度,采用电化学发光免疫分析仪及化学发光免疫分析仪分别检测肺癌患者血清CEA、CA125、NSE、CYFRA21-1和SCC浓度。 结果 肺癌组患者血清中MIC-1浓度显著高于正常对照组(P<0.001)和肺良性疾病组(P<0.001);根据ROC曲线和正常人群的MIC-1血清水平,设1000pg/mL为诊断肺癌的临界值,MIC-1检测肺癌的敏感性和特异性分别为69.5%和96.5%;在不同病理类型中,血清MIC-1对小细胞癌的诊断敏感性高于鳞癌和腺癌,低分化组患者血清MIC-1水平明显高于高分化+中分化组(P<0.05);MIC-1诊断肺癌的敏感性优于已有标志物CEA、CA125、NSE、SCC和CYFRA21-1;在肺癌早期(I期和II期)阶段,MIC-1诊断敏感性优于五种标志物的联合诊断(I期:66.7% vs 50.0%,II期:72.7% vs 69.0%);六种标志物联合诊断则能使I期和II期肺癌诊断敏感性分别提高至77.1%和85.5%。 结论 本研究在较大样本量中证实MIC-1在肺癌诊断中的临床应用价值,提示其可能成为比较理想的肺癌诊断及筛查标志物。

本文引用格式

沈 迪,王小兵,车轶群,刘秋颖,张超,李艳芬,田海梅,李茉,张伟,齐军 . 肺癌患者血清MIC-1升高的临床价值[J]. 标记免疫分析与临床, 2014 , 21(2) : 123 -138 . DOI: 10.11748/bjmy.issn.1006-1703.2014.02.005

Abstract

Abstract:Objective To study the clinical value of serum macrophages inhibitory cytokine-1 (MIC-1) level in patients with lung cancers. Methods The double antibody sandwich ELISA was used to detect serum MIC-1 level in 256 lung cancer patients, 44 benign pulmonary disease patients and 229 healthy persons. ELCIA and CLIA were used to detect the serum CEA, CA125, NSE, CYFRA21-1 and SCC level. Results MIC-1 concentration in lung cancer group was significantly higher than that in normal control group (P<0.001)and benign disease group (P<0.001). According to ROC curve and MIC-1 level of normal control group, the cut-off value of MIC-1 was set at 1000pg/mL, the specificity and sensitivity were 96.5% and 69.5% respectively. In different subtypes of lung cancer, the sensitivity of serum MIC-1 was highest in SCLC group than squamous-cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma groups. The serum level of MIC-1 was higher in low differentiation group than high differentiation and differentiated groups(P<0.05). The sensitivity of MIC-1 for early stage lung cancer was higher than CEA, CA125, NSE, SCC and CYFRA21-1 respectively .The sensitivity of MIC-1 for early stage lung cancer (stage I and stage II) was higher than the combination of the above five markers(stage I: 66.7% vs 50.0%;stage II:72.7% vs 69.0%). The sensitivity of MIC-1 for stage I and stage II was improved to 77.1% 85.5% respectively in the combination of the six markers. Conclusion The present study is to confirm excellent clinical value of MIC-1 in a large sample of lung cancer. MIC-1 may be a new serum marker for lung cancer diagnosis.
Options
文章导航

/